|
cthu1hu 2009-12-06 18:49 I like the ones by this guy . pretty trippy.
thewayofzen 2009-12-06 18:14 @meanmechanics you do not need to clear your name it was never dirty. i think youre a stand up dude and its good to see someone breathing some life into the scene with new subs. keep em coming.
meanmechanics 2009-12-06 14:20 Found this link think our friend cthu1hu will appreciate...or not? :-D
Meanmechanics 2009-12-06 12:28 Like I said I fully support the mods decisions.
my boss has a life size reproduction of the "venus de Milo" behind the receptionist desk. My grandma was an artist and nudity was not something unsafe for her. But once again I fully support your decision because (in case this line was not clear) I have my kids that use my computer and they are the one that I support first. I don't want them to be immersed in a universe full of bare bottoms. My comments were only a way to clear my name from any stain link to fact that I've posted a bare bottom.
I apologized once more for breaking the "nude rule" and wish you to continue because I feel safe to leave a bookmark of Boxshots on my browser
thewayofzen 2009-12-06 07:51 as for the "art" comment. there are those of us that check this site at work. art is a pretty flimsy argument when your bos is wondering why youre looking at some girls behind on company time.
thewayofzen 2009-12-06 07:49 for the record if you were wondering i was the submission rejecter. no offense meant. just remember "if its safe for grandma its safe for boxshots"
Meanmechanics 2009-12-05 13:26 Not agree with you. I respect the mods decision (there's always a kid at home playing with my computers) though I think nudity can be classified in two categories : artful or obscene. In my personal opinion this time it was art but in the absence of a clear definition of what is art and what is not I understand and fully support the mods in their decision. Which doesn't mean that I won't upload nudity but I trust the mods to take the right decision.
auto 2009-12-05 11:41 I always felt this place could use some more bare posteriors. =x
meanmechanics 2009-12-04 23:38 who knows?
cthu1hu 2009-12-03 17:00 no problemo.
|
|
|